Helping The others Realize The Advantages Of case law on cash gift
Helping The others Realize The Advantages Of case law on cash gift
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights even though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided because of the decision on the Supreme Court from the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking within the present case. In these circumstances, this petition is found being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the legislation laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. As a result, the competent authority with the parent department of the petitioner as well as the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount in the petitioner and pay out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits for the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent can also be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the conclusion or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court might interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to really make it suitable into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified through the decision with the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal assistance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed to the court in which the case has been or will be filed.
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Enable the decision stand"—is definitely the principle by which judges are bound to these types of past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.
States also commonly have courts that deal with only a specific subset of legal matters, including family here law and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common regulation, would be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court and the precedent, case legislation can be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision because of the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) is just not strictly bound to Stick to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a single district court in Big apple is not binding on another district court, but the first court’s reasoning may possibly help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions because of the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty to the accused who intentionally murdered the target.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
department concerned shall offer the complete set of ACRs of the concerned officer to DPC properly in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
Please note, Should you be seeking a payment exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses like self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which could lead to reduced charges or acquittal.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved Until case is tried out(Bail Matters)
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but will not be binding precedent.
Finding reliable free case law sites is usually challenging. Lots of websites have to have subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate the landscape of free case legislation resources in Pakistan, supplying you with a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.